Chat Rooms   Forums   Event Calendar      Help/FAQ   
Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
    Search    
Home » Forums » General Audience Forums » Philosophy » Faith or logic?
Upgrade to Gold Membership and remove these advertisements!


«««12345

Faith or logic?Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 4/10/2007 5:03:19 PM
Member

MemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

faith - logic depends on a person's point of view.
Post #773772
Posted 4/10/2007 7:27:18 PM
Member

MemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

Logic-Faith depends on a persons point of view.

Logic is more important, with a caveat. Pragmatically, you need both in the real world. Each is good, but together, the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.

Also, I believe Einstein was very religious. It guided his thoughts and arguments. His response to the theory of Quantum Mechanics was something along the lines of "God does not play dice with the Universe."This message was edited by skywatcher on 4-10-07 @ 7:38 PM
Post #773773
Posted 4/11/2007 8:39:43 AM
Member

MemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty - it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly religious attitude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply religious man. (Albert Einstein)

I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. (Albert Einstein, 1954)

Post #773774
Posted 4/11/2007 8:42:50 AM
Member

MemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. It should transcend personal God and avoid dogma and theology. Covering both the natural and the spiritual, it should be based on a religious sense arising from the experience of all things natural and spiritual as a meaningful unity. Buddhism answers this description. If there is any religion that could cope with modern scientific needs it would be Buddhism. (Albert Einstein)

It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it. (Albert Einstein, 1954) From Albert Einstein: The Human Side, edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffman, Princeton University Press

Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the action of people. For this reason, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, i.e. by a wish addressed to a Supernatural Being. (Albert Einstein, 1936) Responding to a child who wrote and asked if scientists pray. Source: Albert Einstein: The Human Side, Edited by Helen Dukas and Banesh Hoffmann

A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death. (Albert Einstein, "Religion and Science", New York Times Magazine, 9 November 1930

I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such thoughts. I am satisfied with the mystery of the eternity of life and with the awareness and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the existing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in nature. (Albert Einstein, The World as I See It)
Post #773775
Posted 4/11/2007 6:45:18 PM
Member

MemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

I spoke about Einstein with naught but my memory. I'm not saying either of us is right or wrong, but, here are a couple quotations I've found. (by einstein)
-------
I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings.

My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind.

Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.

True religion is real living; living with all one's soul, with all one's goodness and righteousness.

I am a deeply religious nonbeliever - this is a somewhat new kind of religion.

I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil.
-----
There are many more, but this is too much already.
I still think of Einstein as very religious.
Post #773776
Posted 4/11/2007 11:19:19 PM
Member

MemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

History can never be accurate if it is written by the ego-mind of a mutated human.

http://www.witness-pioneer.org/vil/Books/MB_OM/default.htm

This message was edited by Riki on 4-11-07 @ 11:22 PM
Post #773777
Posted 4/12/2007 3:14:54 AM
Member

MemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

Actually, all humans are mutated, especially in the mind. There's a gene in the DNA sequence of humans that produces a protein called myosin, that is shorter and doesn't function properly in the brain.

Post #773778
Posted 4/13/2007 9:25:11 AM
Member

MemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMemberMember

But throughout his life, Einstein was consistent in rejecting the charge that he was an atheist. "There are people who say there is no God," he told a friend. "But what makes me really angry is that they quote me for support of such views." And unlike Sigmund Freud or Bertrand Russell or George Bernard Shaw, Einstein never felt the urge to denigrate those who believed in God; instead, he tended to denigrate atheists. "What separates me from most so-called atheists is a feeling of utter humility toward the unattainable secrets of the harmony of the cosmos," he explained.
In fact, Einstein tended to be more critical of debunkers, who seemed to lack humility or a sense of awe, than of the faithful. "The fanatical atheists," he wrote in a letter, "are like slaves who are still feeling the weight of their chains which they have thrown off after hard struggle. They are creatures who--in their grudge against traditional religion as the 'opium of the masses'-- cannot hear the music of the spheres."

Einstein, on the other hand, believed-as did Spinoza--that a person's actions were just as determined as that of a billiard ball, planet or star. "Human beings in their thinking, feeling and acting are not free but are as causally bound as the stars in their motions," Einstein declared in a statement to a Spinoza Society in 1932. It was a concept he drew also from his reading of Schopenhauer. "Everybody acts not only under external compulsion but also in accordance with inner necessity," he wrote in his famous credo. "Schopenhauer's saying, 'A man can do as he wills, but not will as he wills,' has been a real inspiration to me since my youth; it has been a continual consolation in the face of life's hardships, my own and others', and an unfailing wellspring of tolerance."

Einstein later explained his view of the relationship between science and religion at a conference at the Union Theological Seminary in New York. The realm of science, he said, was to ascertain what was the case, but not evaluate human thoughts and actions about what should be the case. Religion had the reverse mandate. Yet the endeavors worked together at times. "Science can be created only by those who are thoroughly imbued with the aspiration toward truth and understanding," he said. "This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion." The talk got front-page news coverage, and his pithy conclusion became famous. "The situation may be expressed by an image: science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Post #773779
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

«««12345

PermissionsExpand / Collapse

All times are GMT -6:00, Time now is 11:55am

About Us | Contact Us | Link to Us! | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use & Rules | Pop-Up Free!
© 2001 - 2008 The Pork Community Inc.
Execution: 0.188. 15 queries. Compression Enabled.