|
| | | | If you're going to start having those images with Daddy in them marked then we best go ahead and mark all the bondage icons as well because those undercover cops might assume they mean someone has been tied up and kidnapped against their will.
*said tongue in cheek*
(as I really don't think any icons should be branded)
Knighthawk.....Can you specifically recall a single image where there is CLEARLY a child girl and an adult man? |
| |
| | | | *adds for S and KH*
and I'll tell you what was told to me in NHB today - don't like it, click it. |
| |
| | | | CW,
the discussion concerning Daddy/little girl roleplay was discontinued for a reason. the recent thread has no bearing on the fact that many employed images depicting this fetish as with many others before it's creation.
perhaps some forget that the pork employs a Director of graphics that is well prepared to handle issues such as this. with all honesty i cannot fathom Trinna or Her team approving images that went specifically against the policies of the site.
if memory serves me correctly this issue was openly addressed by Cradz last year on the board. he indicated that the images would be removed and the person wearing the icon and individual responsible for it's creation would be held accountable. subsequent infractions could lead to their icons being put on hold until they were approved by the graphics department. should the pattern continue the individual would be subject to removal from the pork. princess
princess
♥~♥~♥~♥~♥~♥~♥~♥~♥~♥~♥~♥
"Ignosce mihi Pater quia peccav. Ingemisco, tamquam reus: culpa rubet vultus meus; supplicanti parce, Deus. Quod me nutrit me destruit. Oro supplex et acclinis, cor contritum quasi cinis, gere curam mei finis. In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti." ~deity |
| |
| | | 
Security Director
|
| KnightHawk{cath}
Child Porn is not allowed in the Pork, period.
Child Pornography is defined as:
The illegal use of children under the age of 18, in pornographic pictures or films, icons, etc.
( kiddie porn, child porn )
Scening "Daddy/little girl" scenarios is, however, considered 'role play' and is acceptable.
If there is some question that an icon has an underage model/image, the user may need to furnish verification of the age, in the questionable icon.
If you're concerned about any icon/image, please report this image to Graphics ( Graphics@the-pork.com ).
Usually when icons go through the coding process in Graphics, a questionable image will come to their attention and checked on the spot.
With the coming of the new Pork 4.0v, we're going to work on making our Terms of Use easier to understand and state what is and what isn't allowed.
pixie:
Basically the same applies with your inquiry as far as the icons go.
We would maybe like to see role play of the "Daddy/little girl" scening done more in the Leathers room, but I'm sure MsKat will have this option taken into account, We will wait to see more where things stand on this subject with this meeting tonight.
Keeping in mind, The Pork will never allow anything that's against the Law... that's rolled in with our Terms of Use.
~Liz~ Understanding where you're coming from, though it isn't keeping to topic here..
NHB was made as an "anything goes" room for chatters to more censor themselves.
This is why Cradz made the Adult Lounge;
For chatters that wish to chat in a moderated room.
Now, if we can migrate more chatters that take offense to harassment, we'll be doing fine. 
*princess*
Thank you for your post, it is much appreciated.
Though I felt this needed to be addressed once again, as some chatters were not familiar with the past Boards or content from last week, much less a year or so ago. ;p
"If we have no peace,
It is because we have
Forgotten that we
Belong to each other."
- Mother Teresa
|
| |
| | | 
Graphics Director
|
| During coding of icons if an image appears to break the TOS regarding the age of the model in it and because of the content of the image, the member is contacted to supply the site where it was taken from and we look into it.
Should the Graphics Team come across something like this in coding, it is brought to my attention immediately. This happens rarely, in all honesty. From what I can see, members are not loading and using icons of this nature.
As CW said, if anyone feels an image is objectionable, all you need to do is contact graphics@the-pork.com with the image in question, and I will look into it immediately.
Will some images get by us ... I am sure it can and will happen, but if a member sees something, then please, by all means, contact us so we can look into it.
Thanks!
|
| |
| | | | I am not quite clear on this, so if an image is of a child and is being used to scene Daddy little girl then that is illegal? cath did in fact report the questionable ones to Cradz I believe. I mean of all the images out there, are ones of children really necessary in that capacity? Good God...
No Liz not of a Man too I don't think, just clearly little girls with the terms Daddy's little girl or something similar on it, cath copied and sent them to Cradz.This message was edited by KnightHawk{cath} on 6-19-06 @ 8:36 PM |
| |
| | | 
Security Director
|
| KnightHawk{cath}
Child Porn is -not- allowed in the Pork, period.
Child Pornography is defined as:
The illegal use of children/models -under the age of 18-, in pornographic pictures or films, icons, etc.
( kiddie porn, child porn )
Scening "Daddy/little girl" scenarios is, however, considered 'role play' and -is- acceptable.
As long as the images -are not- of children under 18, in a sexual setting, and the models can be proven of age.
"If we have no peace,
It is because we have
Forgotten that we
Belong to each other."
- Mother Teresa
|
| |
| | | | I have not seen icon that I have felt were child related or child porn in the Ds rooms. A woman dressing young and holding a teddy bear does not mean child porn to me, it means a woman dresses young.
I would prefer we not go to the *it might be some thing" mentality. This would mean all clean shaven vagina icons will need to be banned. After all any man liking a clean shaven one is really wanting that little girl who is to young to have pubic hair fantasy filled.
So lets get rid of those.
Oh and while we are at it..Those icons of people bound and whipped till the welts rise two inches need to go. Who knows if some one would turn abusive by looking at them.
This idea how stopping what might be, could be or is a possibility
I saw one in NHB that I thought looked like a 12 year old trying to look like a 16 year old hooker. I wrote to Mistress Trinna I think. She reminded me that some icons are rated for the teen room. I have to also remember that I look at icons with a different eye that some. My concern was not ignored at all.
I am finding this talk about the icons to be a bit vague. I am going to keep a look out for what is being talked about
|
| |
| | | | | Nope, these were not women dressed as little girls hugging teddies, these were little girls period on the icons cath reported. I think most can distinguish the difference between a woman dressed as a little girl and a little girl.This message was edited by KnightHawk{cath} on 6-19-06 @ 9:10 PM |
| |
| | | | | Then KH, if it's already been reported to Cradz with the images included why are you bringing it up here again? |
| |
|
|