|
| | | | New Testament
Inscription at Delphi (Gallio)
Temple inscription at Abilene (Lysanias)
Corinth Excavations - Erastus inscription
Sources:
WF Albright
N. Glueck
C J Hemer
J McRay
AN Sherwin-White
I think someone once said something to the effect that you should read and think before responding (so as to avoid sounding and looking like an idiot).
http://www.renewamerica.us
The depravity of man is at once the most unpopular of the Christian doctrines and yet the most empirically verifiable. - Malcolm Muggeridge |
| |
| | | | "New Testament
Inscription at Delphi (Gallio)
Temple inscription at Abilene (Lysanias)
Corinth Excavations - Erastus inscription
Sources:
WF Albright
N. Glueck
C J Hemer
J McRay
AN Sherwin-White"
Not one single scientifically proven reference here. Nor is there any proof in any other form except Christian say so that any of these are real. I may look like an idiot to you madam, but I am far from such. Knowing some about the aging of things carved in stone, I do know that through historical referencing, not one of these items can be proved to be more then 300 years old. Carbon dating has shown no firm evidence of the claims you make.
Doing just a little research that does not include Christian funded science, what you will find is no conclusive evidence that any of these "carvings" originate with true biblical sources. Of course you will find many so called Holy people that will do their best to say otherwise.
Again to the stupidity, speak for yourself when you wish to cut people down moron.
"To know, is to know you know nothing."
-Confucius |
| |
| | | | Kasteele (5/12/2008)
"New Testament
Inscription at Delphi (Gallio)
Temple inscription at Abilene (Lysanias)
Corinth Excavations - Erastus inscription
Sources:
WF Albright
N. Glueck
C J Hemer
J McRay
AN Sherwin-White"
Not one single scientifically proven reference here. Nor is there any proof in any other form except Christian say so that any of these are real. I may look like an idiot to you madam, but I am far from such. Knowing some about the aging of things carved in stone, I do know that through historical referencing, not one of these items can be proved to be more then 300 years old. Carbon dating has shown no firm evidence of the claims you make.
Doing just a little research that does not include Christian funded science, what you will find is no conclusive evidence that any of these "carvings" originate with true biblical sources. Of course you will find many so called Holy people that will do their best to say otherwise.
Again to the stupidity, speak for yourself when you wish to cut people down moron.
Once again, if you'd bother to read, instead of espouse brainlessly, you would have noticed that John McRay is one the leading archaeologists of the last half century, not a 'Holy people'. But a flucking loser like you doesn't bother to check anything, you just go off on self-reported tangents in barely understandable english.
And the fact carbon dating has been proven time and again to be about as reliable as your grammatical and reading skills I suppose also holds no weight with a mental giant like yourself. Carbon dating methods have rated a snail shell at 2,300 years old, yet it was known to have died shortly before the examination, and evolutionists have dated rocks from Hawaiian lava flows (known to be only 200 years old) at 3 billion years old using the Potassium-argon dating method.
I cite sources, and you say "I happen to know." Like I said, while I am speaking for myself, it's a good thing for your kids that they did go to decent schools, because they never would have learned anything aproaching analytical argumentation from a hapless stooge like yourself.
http://www.renewamerica.us
The depravity of man is at once the most unpopular of the Christian doctrines and yet the most empirically verifiable. - Malcolm Muggeridge |
| |
| | | | people like you, who use foul language as a normal way of communicating are a great shame on a place like the pork. You have done nothing but call people down who disagree with you, you waste space with insults instead of true debate. No worries though, sooner or later those in charge will get up and deal with you, heck, they may even deal with me, though I do try not to spout like you have here.
As for the content of your post, it did nothing to change the fact that carbon dating does not confirm what is being reported in claims like the ones you repeat here. Gossip and suggestion does not make historic fact, it makes gossip and suggestion. Do us all a favor, carry on with your attacks and insults if you like, but do keep some realism in it somewhere. I am more then willing to let you make me look stupid like you have, all the way until you once again shoot yourself in the foot and prove me right. People like you make this place into a joke in bad taste.
"To know, is to know you know nothing."
-Confucius |
| |
|
|