| | | | How much should humanity be allowed to do a little self-indulging in? After all, it seems most of only remember this life up until senility.
And, on a side note:
How much should people be allowed to indulge in self-pity when something horrible happens, if any? |
| | | | | | People should be allowed all the self-indulgence they want as long as they are willing to accept the consequences of their actions. No Whining. *S* |
| | | | | | It is all self indulgence, as whatever decision or action we take, we have indulged ourselves to that. No matter what a person does, whether forced or by personal belief, as individuals, we are self indulgent. We react to what affects us or we percieve to affect us. |
| | | | | skywatcher: At any point in time, should people not be allowed to be indulgent? Like with my previously stated question, self-pity? Or murder? Preemptive actions would, in some circumstances, be a much more protective and all around happier matter, shouldn't they?
Chang: Certainly it's not all self-indulgence, is it? Survival instincts, basic life choices, or specific actions are something more or less than a whim or desire, right? |
| | | | | well, one point of view I've heard is each individual's freedom ends where the next guys begins.
yes, pragmatically, there should be limits to self-indulgence. (rape, murder, etc.) should not be allowed. |
| |
|
|